Top Stories
![](/resize/220x180/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/12002624/na2_dom_AveryMagee_APE_RallyAgainstRacism_02112025_-23.jpg)
National Action Network holds rally against racism following Rudd's comments
The National Action Network held a rally denouncing racism after Mayoral Candidate Tim Rudd’s racist remarks against Deputy Mayor Sharon Owens. Read more »
![](/resize/220x180/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/11204400/trump-education-emma-lee-contributing.png)
Opinion: Trump’s DOEd teardown weakens already unequal school system
Get the latest Syracuse news delivered right to your inbox. Subscribe to our newsletter here. Throughout his campaign ahead of the 2024 election, President Donald… Read more »
![](/resize/220x180/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/11222734/ca2_dom_CollinSnyder_SP_MedievalBookExhibit_021125-23.jpg)
The Making of the Medieval Book connects authentic manuscripts to present
Bird Library’s collection of medieval manuscripts on display at the Special Collections Research Center tell a story of the lives of those from the time period. Read more »
I thought when reading the headline that this would be a graphic that compared the various building campaigns that occurred during each chancellors’ tenure, (i.e. 12 campus plans at the beginning/end of each) showing the most recent campus expansion into the city. That would be a more interesting study.
SU has put up some good looking building… that have stood the test of time from a design perspective. AND SU has some disasters. If SU had stayed with a similar classical look (and neo-cassical), the campus would look much better. Instead SU goes with the ‘most modern’ trend of the time, which becomes outdated in 15 or so years. Example: the new Newhouse building. Hence, we have an odd mix of styles… some beautiful (Crouse, HOL, Hendricks, Maxwell), some okay, and some horrible (just about anything built between 1940 and 1980).